Raphael Kubo da Costa <kubito <at> gmail.com> writes: > Konstantinos Smanis <konstantinos.smanis <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 00:03, Konstantinos Smanis > > <konstantinos.smanis <at> gmail.com> wrote: > >>> The following line should probably be simplified (see > >>> http://websvn.kde.org/?revision=1184860&view=revision): > >>> > >>> src/kcm_grub2.cpp:113: QTreeWidgetItem *item = new > >>> QTreeWidgetItem(ui.treeWidget_recover, QStringList(QString()) << name > >>> << partition->filePath() << volume->label() << volume->fsType() << > >>> i18n("%1 GiB", QString::number(volume->size() / 1073741824))); > >> > >> Thanks. Fixed: > >> http://commits.kde.org/kcm-grub2/87eac2b1ef0b8f3a1907b86ab7054b99a0ed5ab9 > >> > >> Konstantinos > > > > If noone else objects, would it be possible for a sysadmin to make the move? > > This is not really an objection, as I have not looked at the code. But > having two different projects with practically identical names > (kcm_grub2 and kcmgrub2) is quite confusing. It'd be nice if this could > be worked out, as both projects have actually asked for review and to be > moved to the same final destination (extragear/sysadmin).
I have talked with Alberto Mattea (the maintainer of kcmgrub2) and he has agreed to give up his request for inclusion in extragear. Our conversation has been over plain e-mails, so I cannot prove this. Perhaps I should contact him to confirm this? Konstantinos
