Hi, I noticed this because of https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101347/ and it made me wonder.. Why is KDE having it's own image/pixmap caching classes when the Qt lib also has them (QPixmapCache and QCache). The only thing you would "miss" is caching QImage.
Anyway, now that the Qt 5 stuff is going on isn't this a good opportunity to merge the differences here (thus making a QImageCache class or something like it) and go with Qt lib ones instead of KDE ones? Kind regards, Mark
