https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423908
Andreas Arnez <ar...@linux.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|jsew...@acm.org |ar...@linux.ibm.com
CC| |ar...@linux.ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Arnez <ar...@linux.ibm.com> ---
I just tried with current upstream and can't reproduce this either. I'm
running on a z16 with Fedora 40.
However, I'm having some trouble with this test case. In my testing gsl-1.6
doesn't even compile as-is:
make auxchecks
...
.../eigen/jacobi.c: In function ‘gsl_eigen_invert_jacobi’:
.../eigen/jacobi.c:227:57: error: passing argument 5 of ‘gsl_eigen_jacobi’ from
incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
227 | status = gsl_eigen_jacobi(tmp, eval, evec, max_rot, &nrot);
...
make[4]: *** [Makefile:614: jacobi.lo] Error 1
Also, gsl's configure.ac has an issue with the checks for IEEE comparisons and
for IEEE denormalized values. These checks fail on my system because their test
programs don't compile. They call exit() without declaring it.
After fixing these issues (I'll attach a patch for that), I seem to get more
failures in the test suite than expected:
FAIL: random-bsd, 10000 steps (1439263323 observed vs 1457025928 expected)
FAIL: random32-bsd, 10000 steps (626977143 observed vs 1663114331 expected)
FAIL: random64-bsd, 10000 steps (1262850638 observed vs 864469165 expected)
FAIL: random128-bsd, 10000 steps (1439263323 observed vs 1457025928 expected)
FAIL: random256-bsd, 10000 steps (2064015170 observed vs 1216357476 expected)
FAIL: random-libc5, 10000 steps (60563615 observed vs 428084942 expected)
FAIL: random32-libc5, 10000 steps (827587933 observed vs 1967452027 expected)
FAIL: random64-libc5, 10000 steps (963916554 observed vs 2106639801 expected)
FAIL: random128-libc5, 10000 steps (60563615 observed vs 428084942 expected)
FAIL: random256-libc5, 10000 steps (799840090 observed vs 116367984 expected)
And one failure less than on x86:
-FAIL: qawo(f456) elist (7.25063790881233303e-15 observed vs
7.25922435194575979e-15 expected)
And while the following doesn't seem to cause an error, I'm not sure if it's
intentional:
.../cdf/test.c: In function ‘test_ugaussian’:
.../cdf/test.c:121:3: warning: floating constant truncated to zero [-Woverflow]
121 | TEST (gsl_cdf_ugaussian_P, (-40.0),
3.655893540915029703748985850e-350, TEST_TOL3);
with the same warning repeating in line 133.
In any case, I don't see the memcheck diagnostics from comment 0. I haven't
investigated the cause for the rng test failures yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
