https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480643
--- Comment #3 from bastimeyer...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #2) > It might make sense to do this without any option, TBH. So I wouldn't be so > quick to assume your patch would be rejected. As said, I'm not a C++/Qt dev, so I'm not familiar with it, as well as your workflows and other requirements, but I can see if I can submit a pull request with my changes later for you guys to review. I've been using a slightly different patch for a few months now though, because the diff I've posted earlier had some surprising QTimer precision issues. It's been working well for me without any issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
