https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491151
--- Comment #2 from Nate Graham <n...@kde.org> --- Then it seems the problem is that we ask the question "is this an OSI or FSF approved free license?" And if we get a no, we present that in the UI as "this app uses a proprietary license". Discover's interpretation is questionable here. Maybe we need three states here: 1. Free software (uses an OSI or FSF-approved license) 2. Unfree software (license is explicitly marked as "proprietary") 3. Unknown licensing state (Doesn't use an OSI or FSF-approved license, but isn't explicitly marked as proprietary; read the license yourself to see what you can and can't do with it) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
