https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487118
--- Comment #5 from Wyatt Childers <kdebugs.81do7@haxing.ninja> --- (In reply to Emil from comment #4) > (In reply to Wyatt Childers from comment #3) > > (In reply to Emil from comment #1) > > > Is this not a bug in kscreenlocker? > > > > > > If I'm not mistaken the logic which correctly detects the inhibition in > > > the > > > battery monitor is here: > > > > > > https://invent.kde.org/plasma/powerdevil/-/blob/master/applets/ > > > batterymonitor/plugin/powermanagementcontrol.cpp > > > > > > But kscreensaver fails to detect that the screen has to be locked: > > > > > > https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kscreenlocker/-/blob/master/ > > > powermanagement_inhibition.cpp > > > > Does the applet depend on kscreenlocker somehow? > > No, but if I understand the bug report correctly (and how I experience it) > the applet does correctly indicate that screen locking *should* be blocked. > Which means it's a bug in kscreenlocker that should also block with > org.freedesktop.portal.Inhibit Nate Graham was quite adamant in the Bug 485376 that the power management behavior is right but the applet is wrong. I don't agree with him (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485376#c15), but none the less I filed this bug to request that Plasma at least be consistent by displaying what it's doing. So no, this is not the bug you're looking for. You may want to leave a comment in Bug 485376. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
