https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488897
burne...@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burne...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from burne...@gmail.com ---
The established convention in PipeWire seems to be to use node.description and
not node.nick. This can also be seen in Szymon's example, where
node.description is much more descriptive than node.nick.
Human-readable node names as defined by ALSA UCM configuration (examples:
https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf/blob/e4277a204cd61f8f68f616df0d8c42e5bdeb1475/ucm2/USB-Audio/Behringer/UMC204HD-HiFi.conf#L76
https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf/blob/e4277a204cd61f8f68f616df0d8c42e5bdeb1475/ucm2/Rockchip/rk3588-es8316/HiFi.conf#L2)
are populated into the node.description field (seemingly with node.nick
prepended to them), rather than node.nick, by PipeWire.
Perhaps the issue here is that PipeWire's node.nick is unhelpful.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
