https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372256
--- Comment #2 from Elvis Angelaccio <elvis.angelac...@kde.org> --- (In reply to Allen Winter from comment #1) > is this a matter of the explanation string being wrong or that we are ok > using QMessageBox in some cases instead of KMessageBox? > > last I knew, we should be using KMessageBox over QMessageBox in KDE > applications. Right, this is more about the warning message (since it's not a Qt4 class). Now that I think about it, if we still have KMessagebox there must be a reason and we should probably use it. So it makes sense that krazy looks for this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
