https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389766
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Brouwers <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Ismael Asensio from comment #14) > (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #12) > > The fact that wetter.com doesn't provide instantaneous temperature > > information is really weird IMO. In addition to this bug report, I saw a lot > > of grumbling about it on Reddit the last time the weather widget came up. It > > also only supports 3 days of forecasting. Maybe we should just delete it. > > The main problem for that is that wetter.com seems to be the only provider > for many locations worldwide. > > I would happily agree to delete it but only when we have an alternative for > this kind of (even non perfect) coverage. Just curious, can it be de-prioritized when superior providers are available in the same location? For example, wetter was the "default" when I last tried, but I live in an area where far better providers are available. Perhaps some kind of rankings to make wetter only used, if nothing else is available? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
