https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487862
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> --- BTW it seems this whole discussion is duplicated in the comments of memcheck/mc_main.c mc_post_clo_init () // We assume that brk()/sbrk() does not initialise new memory. ... With as conclusion: // So we should arguably observe all this. However: // - The current inaccuracy has caused maybe one complaint in seven years(?) // - Relying on the zeroed-ness of whole brk'd pages is pretty grotty... I // doubt most programmers know the above information. // So I'm not terribly unhappy with marking it as undefined. --njn. Which was written in 2009. So maybe times have changed since then. But I don't really remember any false positive report about this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
