https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486474
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Reinholdt <alexander.reinho...@kdemail.net> --- (In reply to Odin Vex from comment #4) > Would libsecret have been a better option for enumeration or could the way > secrets are stored be a collection of all top provide a workaround for > QtKeychain? Actually, it also annoys me a bit that QtKeychain cannot provide the list of all login credentials Smb4K saved. However, since QtKeychain is commonly used in KDE applications and has a very simple API, I decided to use it instead of any other solution. I don't know whether libsecret would have been the better option. I only had a short glimpse at it. If I understand correctly, you suggest to save the login credentials as one data object (collection) into the secret storage. As far as I can see that won't work, because QtKeychain only allows saving key/value pairs (strings). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
