https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483651
--- Comment #6 from Noah Davis <noaha...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to fanzhuyifan from comment #1) > Currently I feel that the corner barrier might be fundamentally incompatible > with this type of screen arrangement, and I don't have any good ideas aside > from decreasing the strength of the corner barrier in general. > > If I may ask, why would users want to arrange two screens diagonally? This > almost seems like an anti-usecase. I mainly use this arrangement when I'm testing multi-monitor behavior, but it is still a valid configuration. Unless this configuration is prohibited in the Display Configuration KCM, we should account for this layout. > Note that diagonal movement should still be possible with 3 or 4 displays > arranged around a shared corner, as long as the movement avoids that shared > corner. Needing to avoid a shared corner doesn't seem like good behavior to me. It's something that has to be discovered through trial and error and doesn't have a clear reason for working that way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
