https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478162
--- Comment #12 from Frederick Zhang <frederick...@tsundere.moe> --- > I don't see any previous mentions of a ghost image in this bug report. Are you > sure you're referring to the right issue? Sorry I was referring to the code comment: 'this fixes a *ghost image* of the spectacle window [...]'. And thank you for pushing the patch! On 31/1/24 05:40, Noah Davis wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478162 > > Noah Davis <noaha...@gmail.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |--- > Status|NEEDSINFO |REPORTED > > --- Comment #9 from Noah Davis <noaha...@gmail.com> --- > (In reply to Frederick Zhang from comment #8) >> Actually, I cannot reproduce the 'ghost image' issue even after removing the >> code that 6e3687a6b261bf5689a198d4644735ec08ab92e2 moved. Spectacle simply >> never has close animation. > > I don't see any previous mentions of a ghost image in this bug report. Are you > sure you're referring to the right issue? > >> I guess this was achieved by >> https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kwin/-/commit/ >> 616783d892db0410497356409698a81311610fc6. Is this something that all window >> close effects supposed to do? > > Something they're supposed to do? I guess, but it feels like a poorly > engineered solution. There unfortunately isn't an alternative solution at this > time, especially for Wayland. > >> If yes, can we simply remove those lines from Spectacle? > > I suppose we can since it's a KWin specific X11 atom to begin with. > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
