https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478942
--- Comment #2 from Alex6 <alex.pre...@laposte.net> --- Le samedi 23 décembre 2023 18:34:16 CET, vous avez écrit : > --- Comment #1 from Johannes Zarl-Zierl <johan...@zarl-zierl.at> --- > Hi Alex, > > Since you explicitly mention the image scale / zoom level: just adding a > padding to the viewer would do nothing to limit scale breaks. I agree. The benefit of this padding would be to have a margin to isolate the displayed image from the screen border. > I suppose you would like an option to specify a (persistent) zoom level > across images? No. Let's take an example: A "panoramic" image (16/9), whatever the actual size, displayed on a 1920*1080 screen with current kpa viewer: - 16/9 landscape: image displayed 1920*1080 px - 9/16 portrait: image displayed 607*1080 px With a display area 1200*1060 px on the same screen - 16/9 landscape: image displayed 1200*675 px - 9/16 portrait: image displayed 597*1060 px which reduces the display gap between "portrait" and "landscape" images Happy Christmas ( even posthumously !) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.