https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478847
--- Comment #3 from da...@kronlid.net --- I tried it 4 times. Two upgrades from within the application itself, and two downloads from what appeared to be the main download server. But possibly it got redirected in the background without me noticing? Anyway the checksum on the main website is the same as the one from the file on disk. It's in the about pop-up I can see the build date and old version number. Also update check reports I need to download 8.2.0 even if I just installed 8.2.0. Let me know if I can do some analysis on my computer. I work as a software developer so just give me instructions and I'll do whatever checks you want me to do. (For example problems can arise if the old version doesn't get uninstalled properly due to file locks and new files can't written so a mismatch between version numbers can happen. But the installer should report this and give error code.) I haven't tried the Qt5-version, only the main windows version of 8.2.0. Den tors 21 dec. 2023 18:37Maik Qualmann <bugzilla_nore...@kde.org> skrev: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478847 > > Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |metzping...@gmail.com > > --- Comment #1 from Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> --- > No, it can't be. Where exactly did you download it from? > Otherwise, uninstall first and then install again. > The fact that an incorrect version name is displayed in the start menu is > fixed, but only with the second installation of the digiKam-8.2.0 > installer. > > Maik > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > You reported the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
