https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439805
--- Comment #9 from ninj...@gmail.com --- On OpenRC, each tab already gets a new cgroup via the autocgroup feature provided by the kernel since 2.6.38. AFAIK, SystemD wants more visibility, which us why it wants processes to use its cgroup management API, so that then it can manage those cgroups in a more personalized way. On Sunday, September 3, 2023, Yury Zhuravlev <bugzilla_nore...@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439805 > > Yury Zhuravlev <stalk...@gmail.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ---------------- > CC| |stalk...@gmail.com > > --- Comment #8 from Yury Zhuravlev <stalk...@gmail.com> --- > What about OpenRC users? Is it make sense to use a separate cgroup for > each tab > on OpenRC? > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are the assignee for the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
