https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473281
Nate Graham <n...@kde.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REPORTED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Nate Graham <n...@kde.org> ---
Indeed, we do. In powerdevil/daemon/chargethresholdhelper.cpp:
if (threshold < 0 || threshold > 100) {
qWarning() << file.fileName() << "contains invalid threshold" << threshold;
continue;
}
The question now is whether these negative threshold numbers are valid and we
should adjust our code to be more lenient, or whether they're invalid and this
needs to be reported to the kernel folks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
