https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466773
--- Comment #2 from diekuhran...@web.de <diekuhran...@web.de> --- Hello Maik, yes, the strange thing is that ART and darktable does not have these problems. Unfortunately, I understand little of your comment: "Exiv2 ( 3 ) : Offset of directory Panasonic, entry 0x8010 is out of bounds: Offset = 0x00010fa0; truncating the entry" ??? But let me ask if digiKam will change something there, or if everything will stay the same. I am very interested in a good conversion to DNG. Switched from Windows to Manjaro Linux, and if I could do without Adobe DNG Converter over wine in the future, would be wonderful. Currently digiKam also has problems with the size of the embedded Jpeg. They are mostly not made in original size but much smaller, unfortunately. My question: What can I do to make digiKam better? I can't program, but I can do a lot of testing. Tell me what, I will do it. Best regards from Michael -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
