https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464870
--- Comment #9 from Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> --- I agree a central check is good - perhaps whenever those values get changed. I don't think this crash is simply because item() returns a null pointer, but because something crashes in the depths of Qt during the call to item(). I'm recompiling Qt with debug symbols, although even if we see what actually triggers the crash, I don't think it will change the conclusion. I can't find any documentation that says whether QStandardItemModel allows negative row numbers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
