https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463848
--- Comment #2 from Shinjo Park <k...@peremen.name> --- As I didn't stored any Korean text in CP949 and made everything UTF-8 since decades ago, even I was not fully aware of the situation... > This price was worth it to ensure that a typo character (`낥` instead of `날`) > would not be lost. Not only for typo or character in composition, but also for some proper names and newly invented words. > It only knows "ms949", "windows-949", and "windows-949-2000", which seem to > all refer to the same codec? According to https://icu4c-demos.unicode.org/icu-bin/convexp?conv=windows-949 it seems true. To make thing more worse, one of the alias (KSC_5601) is shared between CP949 and EUC-KR internally in ICU (see https://icu4c-demos.unicode.org/icu-bin/convexp?conv=euc-kr). As CP949 is a superset of EUC-KR, most Korean implementations interchangeably use them, this is somewhat reflected even in the WHATWG (https://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#names-and-labels). So I think it is just a matter of naming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
