https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355238
--- Comment #11 from Christoph Cullmann <cullm...@kde.org> --- > In any case, an mtime/ctime value of 0 isn't illegal - it means 0 time units > after the unix epoch. Is there any reason the asserts were there other than > to just crash on potential filesystem bugs? I guess there are there because of some misunderstanding that 0 is not allowed. But given that any tar archive might contain such timestamps, it is very bad to assert on that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
