https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461206
Johannes Zarl-Zierl <johan...@zarl-zierl.at> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |johan...@zarl-zierl.at
Status|REPORTED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Zarl-Zierl <johan...@zarl-zierl.at> ---
There is a task on the phabricator workboard for this exact issue:
https://phabricator.kde.org/T12933
Short story: yes, you are right, this should be stored within the database
file.
IMO the information, which tag is used for the untagged image feature is not
really a (shared) setting, but a property of the data itself (much like the
tokens category being handled specially). That's why I would favor the same
approach taken with the tokens category, adding a 'meta="mark-untagged"'
attribute or similar.
When I added the task, I hoped to be faster with the refactoring and therefore
be able to postpone the implementation until the database was better isolated.
OTOH this change is not really that hard, so I'm not against implementing this
before The Great Refactoring(tm).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
