https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458212
--- Comment #5 from Jim Kuhn <jim.k...@gmail.com> --- > Is using %p in the filename a satisfactory workaround? That's probably fine for cases where the multiple xml files can be easily post-processed, but I suspect there are a lot of consumers of this data that expect it to be in one file (Jenkins plugins, for one). Perhaps both options could be provided (legacy [single-file] and new [multi-file]) with a push to getting downstream consumers to use the new multi-file output. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
