https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460153

--- Comment #6 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Hi Maik,

As i can see the process sounds like faster, but as i use WIFI i can judge is
it's really better ++ or not. Also i use only Linux, not Windows here with the
NAS.

The patch is not too much intrusive. It only touch one source file. We can try
to back-port temporally to qt5-maintenance, i rebuild the Window installer, and
Peter can check if performances are better. If not, patch can be easily
reverted.

Peter, what do you think about ?

Gilles

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to