https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432883
Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
| |.net
--- Comment #4 from Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> ---
Party can certainly be used that way, but I would consider it awkward used
alone (think "paying party" or "receiving party"). If I saw just "Party" as
the label on a data field, without already knowing what it was supposed to
mean, it would not be obvious to me. I have also considered "Partner" but
rejected it for similar reasons, including that for a transfer with a bank, the
bank could be considered the partner, but would be indicated by the Account in
the Category field, not as Payee or Payor.
To go back to one of my earlier thought, would using "Payee/Payor" as the label
actually be reasonable? I was concerned about trying to minimize space, but if
using both would address the original concern, it might be the easiest
solution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
