https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410425
j...@acm.org <j...@acm.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |j...@acm.org
--- Comment #3 from j...@acm.org <j...@acm.org> ---
(In reply to Israel G. Lugo from comment #1)
> Please, do implement this. I used this feature regularly in Lightroom.
>
> It is definitely really nice to have the option of creating actual tags.
> But it would be even better to have the option to enable both the tags and
> the XMP location fields. Location fields have semantic meaning, which can be
> interpreted e.g. for location-based searches.
>
> There could be a couple of checkboxes in the GUI:
> [ ] Store location in a tag tree
> [ ] Store location in XMP location fields
>
> To clarify, these would be the City/Sublocation/State/Province/Country
> fields in "Edit Metadata->XMP->Origin".
>
> See https://iptc.org/std/photometadata/specification/IPTC-PhotoMetadata
>
> Ideally, there would be support for the less ambiguous LocationShown and
> LocationCreated, but that may be out of scope.
>
> There was some discussion about this here:
> http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/Automatic-filling-of-IPTC-XMP-location-
> tags-based-on-GPS-coordinates-tp2164284p2165222.html
>
> I was misled by the "Write tags to XMP" checkbox, thinking it would do what
> MarcP asked for. But enabling it seemed to have no effect. I have no idea
> what that checkbox does. Looking at the code, it seems to store tags in some
> "Xmp.digiKam.TagsList" field, which seems unrelated to this.
Location Created is in one set of IPTC Geolocation tags (lat, long). Location
shown is in a separate set of Geolocation tags. Very few photographs use the
later set, but any camera with a GPS, or synced with a GPS track will populate
the former. Yes, it would be cool, but.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
