https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455360
--- Comment #7 from Artur Rudenko <catcool...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Artur Rudenko from comment #6) > (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #5) > > I can't remember if inhibitions are universal, or an app gets to choose what > > to inhibit. Hopefully the Powerdevil developers can help some more. > > Looks like I didn't understand the problem correctly. Lutris (which has the > problem I described) uses Gtk.Application.inhibit with > GTK_APPLICATION_INHIBIT_SUSPEND and GTK_APPLICATION_INHIBIT_IDLE flags. > GTK_APPLICATION_INHIBIT_IDLE flag should inhibit both dim screen and lock > screen (if I understood correctly from > https://docs.gtk.org/gtk3/flags.ApplicationInhibitFlags.html) but > powerdevil(?) interprets it as "disable lock screen but not dim screen" so > it's probably powerdevil's regression. But it only work not intended when an > app is not in focus. > > It's a bug anyway because it either should ignore inhibitors for minimized > apps or respect them fully anywhere except lock screen. Blocking auto > locking and not screen dimming is confusing. In addition, because of this bug, lutris now can't block screen dimming for games anymore. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
