https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452348

--- Comment #5 from doncb...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Niccolò Venerandi from comment #4)
> Generally speaking I'd agree this is something that should be achieved;
> however, the "opaque?" flag, differently from "contrast effect on?" one,
> depends on which panel we're currently talking about. This means that it's
> practically impossible for all PlasmoidHeaders to use the solid/ style when
> they are in a widget of a opaque panel, as they can't know in which panel
> they are at all.

Hmmm, I suppose I saw this coming when the introduction of opaque (solid?) did
not support all plasmoid backgrounds. Is it out of the question to design
panels that properly support the different asset sets for Plasma 6 now that we
have an idea of how things might be customized?

> Right now we *do not* ship with a PlasmoidHeading.svg inside of solid/. I
> would close this as a WONTFIX.

I don't understand these 2 ideas. The fallback is generally the default
widgets/ items, so I can't see any harm in it. Not to mention, I'm pretty sure
it's just copy and paste the default one to ship something.

> (Interestingly enough though, we *do* ship tooltip and dialog background
> svgs in solid, but those IIRC are not used anywhere either...)

I'm fairly certain about never seeing tooltip function properly, but now I'm
curious as to what is showing if the dialog background isn't being used.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to