https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146865

Dan Fallon <dan...@fallon.io> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dan...@fallon.io

--- Comment #11 from Dan Fallon <dan...@fallon.io> ---
(In reply to Kjetil Kjernsmo from comment #10)
> This is now becoming possible within the Solid Project,
> https://solidproject.org/ . We recently published the 0.9 version of the
> protocol spec:
> https://solidproject.org/TR/protocol
Kjetil,

I believe this feature request was requesting the ability to have multiple
users work on a collection at the same time. In a studio setting, for example,
you would want multiple editors to be able to access photos from a recent shoot
to expedite the tagging and rating of photos from a recent photoshoot. For a
home user, alternatively, they may want to have a photo library stored on
network attached storage but have the freedom to edit from multiple computers.

It also seems like *parts* of this have been implemented--excepting some
caveats regarding simultaneous updates not refreshing the UI of other users.
Might be worth closing this in favor of a newer ticket that better reflects the
current state of things.
see this article from 2018 about migrating your digikam database to MySQL and a
NAS:
    https://www.digikam.org/news/2018-10-20_digikam_nas_mariadb/ 
and this documentation about how to handle a non-sqlite backend:
https://docs.kde.org/trunk5/en/digikam-doc/digikam/using-setup.html#using-setup-database
and this fixed bug-report about using a separate thumbnail database:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297922
and this still open one about absolute paths being stored in the database:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275261

(In reply to Kjetil Kjernsmo from comment #10)
> This is now becoming possible within the Solid Project,
> https://solidproject.org/ . We recently published the 0.9 version of the
> protocol spec:
> https://solidproject.org/TR/protocol

solidproject seems better suited to replicating the feature-set of a photo
library like google photos. Allowing users to share photos/albums with a larger
audience. While this seems like a cool idea, it seems like you didn't read the
rest of the thread before necro'ing this feature request to promote a project
you work on...

https://solidproject.org/team#kjetil-kjernsmo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to