https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341143
cipricus <cipri...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cipri...@gmail.com
--- Comment #466 from cipricus <cipri...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to David Edmundson from comment #13)
> Your best bet will be to argue this line with a valid reason.
>
> >different workspaces with different containment/wallpaper can be done with
> >activities, and that's what's supported.
>
> So far the only argument I've seen is "I don't see a reason to use them"
> which doesn't stand up as a reason when it solves exactly what you're asking
> for.
Desktops/workspaces do need wallpaper differentiation —as much as activities
do. Saying that one should use activities for wallpapers is like saying "don't
use desktops" or like saying "use workspaces instead" when one would complain
that there is no activity grid and no other easy way like a shortcut to move
windows between activities. Both activities and workspaces need wallpapers and
grid, and "send-window" shortcut. As they are they are both imperfect and
incapable of compensating each other's faults:
https://www.reddit.com/r/kde/comments/rcezjw/are_activities_supposed_to_combine_with_virtual/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
