https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355679
--- Comment #27 from Lonnie <k...@startport.com> --- "Zero route" approach? You closed the previous proposal because you didn't consider all the ramification of not granting it. Now that you see more ramifications, you impose ridiculous requirements on Nate: causing him to implement a solution that's less than optimal. Sometimes, the route propose by the reporter, is exactly optimal. Anything less leads to impertinence, as I see here. If you want to surprise me, admit the proposal (as proposed) is optimal and don't try to make Nate shoehorn the request into an "Activity Switcher", when the more pertinent placement is EXACTLY as requested. I don't expect my directness to persuade you at all. If anything you'll be completely put off by my words despite what truth they may hold. Again, I've been drinking. And my tact right now is deficient at best. I'm proud that I've at least restrained my profanity. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
