https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355139
--- Comment #8 from Lapineige <lp....@lavache.com> --- > My immediate thought would be to make it adapt to the new dimensions, but > with roughly the same window size as before. It would make it predictable > since it wouldn't make the window cover your screen for big pictures or > impossibly tiny with small ones, but instead stay pretty consistent. Very good point, I didn't think about that. > If you would want a smaller or larger window, you'd just change the size and > click the adjust button to make it fit nicely. Sounds like a good way to do it. To be honest I first thought about a window changing its size between images, but mainly between images that had mostly the same size, and some bigger ones (let's say from 1/4 of a screen to full screen), not tiny ones. In that last case, it would probably be annoying. > > I would say that if it's made in a way that make the header (...), > >in my opinion that would be the more predictable and mainly the >> less inconvenient way to do it. >Could you clarify please? First of all, that was kind of independent from your following idea. Second: If the window change its size, it could do it in different ways. Some of them would "move" all its 4 sides to another place, some would only change let's say the right and bottom side… My point is that it should avoid moving the "header"/title bar (I don't know the name of that window element), the upper side I mean. Yet the thing is, if as you have proposed its only the window aspect ratio that is changing (not the whole size + ratio), then it's already less problematic as the windows would usually¹ not change that much. ¹ apart from going from let's say portrait image to a large panoramic with a relatively low height -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
