https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366036
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Reifenberger <tspam+bugs.kde....@rfnbrgr.de> --- > Regarding the behaviour: Digikam does treat symlinks like "real files", > e.g. every symlink has its own set of tags in the database. This is the behavior I would consider correct. Being able to use symlinks that are treated as normal files is an essential part of my workflow (tm): I use git with git-annex to manage my photos. The raw files are added via git-annex (and therefore replaced by symlinks to read-only files in read-only directories), while the sidecar files remain normal files managed by pure git. The raw files are never supposed to be changed anymore, while the metadata is kept under version control independent of a single tool (I use darktable for raw processing and digikam for almost everything else) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
