https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342056
--- Comment #33 from Nick <nick.craig....@gmail.com> --- (In reply to empyreal from comment #31) > This problem persists. 362 GB of data. F5 list of folders in Krusader from > internal NTFS HDD to external NTFS USB 3.0 HDD. > > 40 GB were copied very fast – 20 min or so. 180 GB were copied slowly in 3hr > and I thought the rest 182 GB would be copied in 3hrs but it didn’t happen. > Almost 12 hrs passed, but it copied 270 GB. > 90 GB still to go according to copying status. > It’s definitely not OK. I feel your pain, while I love Dolphin, for me it's only capable of dealing with small amounts of data due to this 'grave' bug. And yes it is a grave bug for those that work with a lot of data. I generally use cp and rsync instead of dolphin for anything more than a few files. Having said that there is absolutely no reason why Dolphin should not be as fast as cp or rsync , we are talking I/O here, orders of magnitude slower than any CPU can operate at. The problem here is a bug or at least the way Dolphin does the copy. If that's correct that every time a file is copied some massive list is sorted then that's just not the way you do it. I only wish I could devote my time to fixing this problem. It's the one bug/feature in Dolphin that spoils an otherwise excellent program. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
