https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330920
Mehmet gelisin <mehmetgeli...@aol.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mehmetgeli...@aol.com
--- Comment #13 from Mehmet gelisin <mehmetgeli...@aol.com> ---
SUMMARY
Old DNG images, shot with Fujifilm S3, then run through Adobe RAW DNG converter
show up completely purple. This happens with some other apps, some are fine
(Preview, Xee on Mac) http://www.compilatori.com/
The jpeg thumb is fine.
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. open it with digikam for preview or edit
http://www.logoarts.co.uk/
I can prevent the error by running it through Adobe RAW converter again, but
activating the custom setting "Linear (demosaiced)". Then the DNG looks fine.
OBSERVED RESULT http://www.slipstone.co.uk/
image is purple
EXPECTED RESULT
regular image http://embermanchester.uk/
SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Ubuntu 18.04
Linux/KDE Plasma:
(available in About System)
KDE Plasma Version:
KDE Frameworks Version: http://connstr.net/
Qt Version:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SUMMARY
Old DNG images, shot with Fujifilm S3, then run through Adobe RAW DNG converter
show up completely purple. This happens with some other apps, some are fine
(Preview, Xee on Mac)
The jpeg thumb is fine. http://joerg.li/
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. open it with digikam for preview or edit
http://www.jopspeech.com/
I can prevent the error by running it through Adobe RAW converter again, but
activating the custom setting "Linear (demosaiced)". Then the DNG looks fine.
OBSERVED RESULT
image is purple
http://www.wearelondonmade.com/
EXPECTED RESULT
regular image
SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Ubuntu 18.04
Linux/KDE Plasma:
(available in About System)
KDE Plasma Version:
KDE Frameworks Version:
Qt Version:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
http://www.acpirateradio.co.uk/
Thanks for that. The files certainly seem wacky. Different apps, different
results. Possibly related to the libs they use? BTW I tried digikam 7.0 beta 2,
no change.
For the sake of it https://www.webb-dev.co.uk/ I had a look with exifprobe,
that starts to output https://waytowhatsnext.com/ some maker notes, then
segfaults. exiftool runs through fine, but I have to admit I am not sure if the
maker notes are output.
The man pages of exiftool mention that: "A common problem with some image
editors is http://www.iu-bloomington.com/ that offsets in the maker notes are
not adjusted properly when the file is modified. " Maybe it depends on the
cleverness (?) or resillience of the reader to handle that kind of damage?
http://www-look-4.com/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
