https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441873
--- Comment #7 from Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> --- What kind of program was your attachment 12345 created by? If so, we need the corresponding image. If your collection was scanned again, you did something wrong. Since you wrote in the other bug report that you changed the volume IDs manually in the database, something went wrong anyway. If the correct tags were not imported, you probably have a mix of tags in your images and you have to configure the advanced metadata settings in digiKam accordingly. The migration of the database works flawlessly. We are performing a database update in digiKam-7.4.0, I have converted my database in all directions for the test. Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
