https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438454
--- Comment #13 from Oleksandr Ostrenko <oleksandr.ostre...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Yuri Chornoivan from comment #12)
> (In reply to Oleksandr Ostrenko from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #9)
> > > Roboto is a terrible substitution for ZapfDingbats (which my quess is
> > > what's
> > > being used for the dots).
> > >
> > > Install a package that gives you an actual ZapfDingbats compatible font
> > > like
> > > D050000L.otf and while at it please complain to your distro to make that a
> > > very very very very recommended package for okular.
> >
> > OK, after checking my packages I found some Zapfding fonts in
> > texlive-zapfding:
> >
> > /usr/share/texmf/dvips/zapfding/config.uzd
> > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/afm/adobe/zapfding/pzdr.afm
> > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/afm/urw/zapfding/uzdr.afm
> > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/zapfding/uzd.map
> > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/adobe/zapfding/pzdr.tfm
> > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/urw35vf/zapfding/uzdr.tfm
> > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/urw/zapfding/uzdr.pfb
> > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/urw/zapfding/uzdr.pfm
> > /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/zapfding/uuzd.fd
> >
> > But no OTF fonts. I tried looking into other packages and I found
> > D050000L.{afm,pfb} in ghostscript-fonts-std. But, again, not an OTF font. So
> > I had to download and install it manually and, voila, now it works.
> >
> > However, I don't quite understand why none of the installed fonts from
> > texlive-zapfding or ghostscript-fonts-std could be used to substitute it.
> > Did I miss anything or is it bug? If so, what should I report it against?
>
> DejaVu Sans (dejavu-fonts package) should be enough. You can file a bug
> report against openSUSE package to include it as a dependence as proposed by
> Albert.
I am sorry, I am still a bit confused.
I had all those fonts installed (dejavu-fonts, texlive-zapfding,
ghostscript-fonts-std) and it still did not work, until I MANUALLY downloaded
an OTF file for Zapfding from the web and installed it. I had the other fonts
installed as afm & pfb files, but, apparently, they are not considered for
rendering by okular. For instance, Roboto.ttf was choosen over
D050000L.{afm,pfb}. Is this the expected behavior? Sorry if that is seems
trivial, but I am a bit lost here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
