https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438378
--- Comment #4 from Andrius Štikonas <andr...@stikonas.eu> --- (In reply to Chris Murphy from comment #3) > I did test it in Fedora and the file system was not renamed even though > Partition Manager claims it was done. But that'd be a separate bug report; > any tips on getting verbose information from partition manager to include in > a bug report? > > What I learned from both btrfs and xfs upstreams yesterday, is that both > "xfs_io -c 'label'" and "btrfs filesystem label" commands use > FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL. And testing each command on btrfs and xfs file systems, > shows they work (interchangeable, there's no fs check so either command > works on either file system). That's hilariously cool and confusing. I > wonder if there might be a preference for a single util-linux command for > this? There is fsadm, part of lvm tools, which supports file system resize > for ext4 and xfs (not yet btrfs). In a way it'd be better suited for fsadm > to gain btrfs resize; and gain label rename via FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL. And put > fsadm into util-linux as a more generic tool for such tasks. you can run it with KPMCORE_DEBUG=1 and see which commands it ran. Then you can also see if those commands (e.g. btrfs rename) work from terminal rather than partition manager. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
