https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431223
--- Comment #29 from Christoph Cullmann <cullm...@kde.org> --- (In reply to Timothée Ravier from comment #28) > To move things forward, I'm suggesting we keep Kate on Flathub but in a Beta > state, where we can still try to improve support while at the same time > making it clear to users that some features may not work. > > As Flathub maintainers, we try to keep Flatpak specific issues in the > Flathub issues tracker so as upstream Kate developers, feel free to send > users back to us for issues you can not or do not have time to fix. > > See also the discussion at > https://invent.kde.org/teams/flathub/issues/-/issues/9 Please not. As long as nobody started to work on this, I don't want some Beta package that never is fixed. People ignore "Beta" classification and we will just have bad impressions left for people trying it. If somebody provides patches to have at least the terminal/projects/build/lsp stuff working properly, I am fine with trying this again. And these are not mere "niche" features, terminal & project are default on, LSP is one of the main selling points since 1-2 years. If they don't work properly, that is BAD. We did start to promote Kate on Windows only after we had something that works there. And yes, there the "terminal" is disabled, as Konsole is not yet ported, but all other stuff works as intended, naturally for the Windows Store variant, too, as that has no sandboxing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
