https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433929
--- Comment #3 from Michael <michael.zoeh...@outlook.com> --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1) > More or less a duplicate of bug 254099. There is a wish to run digiKam on > the server to run the collection scan. > > The question is rather where the performance problem is with you? When > reading the files from the NAS? Do you use a drive path or a UNC path to > access the image collection in digiKam? > > Maik Great, that someone else had this idea. I tried multiple approaches to reach my photos. From technical perspective I don't see a difference but worth to mention. I added the photo directory as a network drive on windows. Then I said to digikam load this local storage. Second approach, I added the server path to digikam as network collection. No difference in speed. Which I was assume because both ways always relay on samba network sharing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
