https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431431

David REVOY <i...@davidrevoy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |i...@davidrevoy.com

--- Comment #1 from David REVOY <i...@davidrevoy.com> ---
Hi Dodger, I can reproduce here and I understand it can be problematic to loose
the content of the hidden (Layer 1). 

> EXPECTED RESULT
> 3: User is prohibited from merging down (option is greyed out) when the layer 
> below 

At a first glance: Yes. This is a similar solution than what is happening to a
merge with a "Locked:Yes" layer underneath. That sounds like a safe solution,
leading users to ask themselves why nothing is done and merged. It might
attracts their attention to the situation of the layer stack to notice a hidden
layer is involved in the process.

But also let's wait for other feedback, especially about how other software
handle this as convention and workflow might also already exists about that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to