https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=294681

--- Comment #9 from Claudius Ellsel <claudius.ell...@live.de> ---
(In reply to ilkerk from comment #8)
> (In reply to Claudius Ellsel from comment #7)
> > (In reply to ilkerk from comment #6)
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > I did the below two lines of changes and compiled it. Now the second
> > > instance of yakuake seems to be working for me without any issues for a
> > > couple of months. 
> > > I suggest that yakuake can take two extra parameters: ApplicationName and
> > > config file url. Maybe these two simple changes (as below) would be
> > > sufficient to run another instance of yakuake? 
> > > If so, that would make us happy. Thanks. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Two lines changed are:
> > > In main cpp: application name set to yakuake2 (using 
> > > app.setApplicationName )
> > > In yakuake.kcfg :  yakuakerc is replaced with yakuake2rc
> > 
> > Maybe you can get this into some nice solution that can get merged into
> > Yakuake? I am sure there are developers willing to assist you when you need
> > help.
> 
> Developers explained their thoughts about the request in OP above. 
>  I think developers can do the two code changes I mentioned above less than
> a minute if they want to and if they believe changes won't cause any trouble.
> My suggestions above was a workaround, and by the way I'm using it daily and
> it has been working without any trouble.
> 
> best,

As I said, maybe you can get this into some nice solution that can get merged
into Yakuake. Obviously the current workaround as it is is not suitable to
merge. But I thought maybe you wanted to extent it in a way it could actually
be merged. However, as Eike said above that might require major code
refactoring.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to