https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425148
--- Comment #6 from Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> --- (In reply to David Hurka from comment #4) > (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #1) > > Sure, valid issue, but at this point how many people are left using such old > > versions that this is actually an issue we want to spend time fixing? > > Yes, I think we should support upgrading from such old versions. At least > when the fix does not require structural changes in Okular. The submitted MR > 239 looks promising to me, although it doesn’t pass tests right now. To be fair we support upgrading from such old versions, one could argue that the annotation timestamp being changed is even correct since now it's inside the PDF and previously wasn't, but i guess one could argue that this is a technicality and that the annotation was really added in the past to the users point of view. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
