https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422554
--- Comment #2 from Harald Sitter <sit...@kde.org> --- for the record: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/secauthz/how-dacls-control-access-to-an-object & https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/secauthz/order-of-aces-in-a-dacl Which if that is what samba follows means ACLS ought to be sorted thusly: - all users - all D - all R - all F - all groups - all D - all R - all F - everyone I think! (haven't really read up on this in detail; plus someone needs to talk to upstream to fix their docs anyway) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
