https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363638
--- Comment #14 from Simon <freisi...@gmail.com> --- Just for my own education, so only answer if you have time: I have seen that you removed the return() calls in the else parts. My reason to use them was, that any further evaluation becomes useless (it already failed to find an essential part). It would be great if you could tell me the reason for not using return calls there. On 03/06/16 06:32, via KDE Bugzilla wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363638 > > --- Comment #13 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com --- > Git commit 401f077455ff1b4537262880b63458cac200c9c9 by Gilles Caulier. > Committed on 03/06/2016 at 04:30. > Pushed by cgilles into branch 'master'. > > apply patch #99332 to polish gphoto2 detection > > M +30 -9 cmake/modules/FindGphoto2.cmake > > http://commits.kde.org/digikam/401f077455ff1b4537262880b63458cac200c9c9 > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
