https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417238
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Arnez <ar...@linux.ibm.com> --- (In reply to Aleksandar Rikalo from comment #3) [...] > The other possible way to fix [...] seems like it would be more > complicated, especially because valgrind_[set|get]_vbits() functions (see > valgrind.c) have to be modified. > > [...] I'm not sure how much logic would be simplified > by eliminating the u8, ..., u32 fields (e.g., concat_vbits() function). I > would put that option aside. FWIW, I'd be fine with that. Julian, what do you think? Can we move this forward? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.