https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418224

--- Comment #2 from kaspar.smoolena...@gmail.com ---
Thank you for the quick reply.

I see I should press "save". Yes. That button was so oddly labeled I
preferred to not click it. "Save" to me implies something gets stored on a
disk or in a database.
Thanks. I'll try that.

Ok. I'll keep in mind this part is rough around the edges.
I have to find "Lester bold" in a very long list of fonts and after
scrolling through the list for the n'th time I thought I best report this
annoyance.

Good day,
K.


On Wed 26 Feb 2020, 16:59 Tymond <bugzilla_nore...@kde.org> wrote:

> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418224
>
> Tymond <tamtamy.tym...@gmail.com> changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|REPORTED                    |NEEDSINFO
>                  CC|                            |tamtamy.tym...@gmail.com
>          Resolution|---                         |WAITINGFORINFO
>
> --- Comment #1 from Tymond <tamtamy.tym...@gmail.com> ---
> Ad 1.: it's to make sure we can talk to the person back, and that we don't
> get
> too much spam. Also it's KDE-wide, not something Krita team has a huge
> influence over. There are other places people can complain about Krita
> (reddit,
> KDE forum, krita-artists.org) and we're fine with writing bug reports
> based on
> their experiences, if there is a bug to fix. It's even better, actually, in
> case someone is to make a bug report for the first time: for example, you
> mentioned a few issues in one bug reports, while every issue should have
> their
> own bug report (2a, 2b and 2c could be together, but 2d is very different)
> for
> developers to have easier time to fix them. (And sometimes issues reported
> by
> users fits the user support forum better).
>
> The text tool is kind of still very rough and we know about it. There is a
> lot
> of work that needs to be done to get it right, because Qt, which is the
> library
> Krita uses, is too limited to allow for what we want to achieve and what
> users
> would want out of the text tool. Now the paid Krita team members are
> working on
> resource management system rewrite so we don't have time to focus on the
> text
> tool as well, and text tool and shortcuts system are two other big issues
> we
> need to fix in the future.
>
> Ad 2a, 2b and 2c: you know you (for now) need to select the text, then
> change
> the values. Then you need to click "Apply" or "Save" to see the effect on
> the
> canvas. Yes, it's tedious, I agree.
>
> Ad 2a: reproducible; although the last used fonts are on top of the list.
>
> Ad 2b: reproducible
>
> Ad 2c: reproducible, it's because it takes the current Foreground color
> for the
> font.
>
> Ad 2d: I cannot reproduce it. What exact steps do you make to get the text
> on
> the canvas? Even with default settings (on, let's say, a new canvas using
> the
> "Texture 256x256" size template), you should get the Lorem ipsum text on
> the
> canvas just by activating the text tool (if your current Foreground color
> is
> different from the canvas color enough for you to see it...).
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to