https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412299
Nate Graham <n...@kde.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REPORTED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INTENTIONAL
--- Comment #4 from Nate Graham <n...@kde.org> ---
(In reply to Filipus Klutiero from comment #2)
> Obviously, A. and B.2. conflict (except - technically - if INTENTIONAL is
> applied to already fixed bugs, but INTENTIONAL was obviously not designed to
> be applied to resolved issues).
I see the problem. You are reading these words and ascribing to them a
conventional, conversational meaning that makes sense to you rather than
learning their specific technical meaning in the context of a bug tracker. I
will once again point you to
https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/Bug_Reporting#Understand_what_the_resolution_statuses_mean
Allow me to quote two passages:
> RESOLVED does not necessarily mean that the issue has been fixed for you,
> just that the Bugzilla ticket itself is no longer actionable by the
> developers.
> For example, a Bugzilla ticket may be marked as RESOLVED UPSTREAM if it's
> traced to a Qt issue, even if the Qt issue has not yet been fixed, or the
> version of Qt that fixes the bug is not yet released or available in your
> distro.
> RESOLVED INTENTIONAL does not mean "shut up and go away, we don't care!" What
> is much more likely is that the issue is not actually considered a real issue,
> or cannot be fixed without a reasonable amount of engineering effort.
I hope that helps you understand the technical meanings of these words in this
context.
> > You don't need to be so pedantic regarding the resolution statuses.
>
> What are you trying to imply here?
I'm not implying anything. :) I'm outright stating that you are being pedantic
regarding the resolution statuses. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
