https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412725
--- Comment #11 from James Th <ja...@thornber.io> --- I think you're missing the point. The point is quite simply, you shouldn't have to agree with me, but you should at least listen to what I say. The question is to do with respecting of my ideas, both as an end-user, and as a member of the KDE community. I don't see your role as being Kmail's gate- keeper. I see your role as being a listener to ideas and opinions, and having the common-sense to be able to say "OK, i don't necessarily agree with what this person is proposing, but there might be an idea worth implementing for the good of the end-users." By me asking for the possibility to separate email addresses is really not a silly idea. Outlook, Apple mail, etc do this by default. If I wrote a feature request asking for kmail to default to a pink colour scheme with purple unicorns, i would expect you to use the intelligence that you have, and say 'no'. My only "fault" in all this is to request a feature that so many other email clients use. When you wrote and explained to me, that there was a reason why we have multiple 'To:' boxes, I didn't rubbish your thoughts, or your explanation. I took it onboard, listened to your reasons, and I came up with what I believe to be a reasonable compromise so that we could both have a solution. To be told by someone else that this is 'an exotic feature that is only useful to your workflow" is rude, unnecessary, and unhelpful. Do you know that just like you, I really, really like kmail. It's so much better than Thunderbird, and just like you I want it to succeed. It's the only mail client that I have on my openSUSE TW box, it's the only one that I actually want to use. We have common-ground, I would just like us to build on that, and to build a successful solution that works for all of us. To engage with each other, and to challenge each other is great! To basically piss on my ideas, because people don't believe in them is not democratic, fair, helpful, or professional. > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412725 > > --- Comment #10 from Laurent Montel <mon...@kde.org> --- > (In reply to James Th from comment #9) > > > If ever you wonder why people don't use kmail, it's exactly things like > > this that are the reason why. > > > > Poor design, lack of compromise, and etotistical attitudes. > > A bad design because you can't write "f...@kde.org, b...@kde.org" ?:) > Is it not work when we use several line ? if it's the case ok it's a bad > design. > But adding a option only because you prefer having "f...@kde.org, > b...@kde.org" it's not a solution. and I don't think that it's a lack of > compromise when you just want to complexify code only as you want to be > able to write to email separated with a ',' ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
