https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412565
--- Comment #2 from Recesvintvs <colabor...@pseudoname.io> --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #1) > Dolphin uses the Solid framework for mounting, which does read /etc/fstab > and respects any manually-adjusted mount parameters you've defined. Can you > confirm that the partition is actually not being mounted correctly, or is > this a supposition? I read somewhere, I think it was in the KDE forums, some years ago, that Dolphin had its own mount method. Perhaps was an old post. There's a lot of outdated info in KDE forums and many blogs that is obsolete and should be updated or deleted. Anyway, the case is that Compsize (https://github.com/kilobyte/compsize) reports this about one of my docs-only folders: Processed 16313 files, 12991 regular extents (12992 refs), 5967 inline. Type Perc Disk Usage Uncompressed Referenced TOTAL 99% 13G 13G 13G none 100% 13G 13G 13G lzo 49% 2.8M 5.6M 5.6M zstd 34% 5.7M 16M 16M I can't really swear the partition in question is being mounted incorrectly or the problem comes from other side, but considering this is a folder which content is only text documents, seems obvious that the BTRFS compression is not being used. Some PDF in this folder contain embedded JPG images and some others are PDF with the format's builtin compression, thus BTRFS doesn't try to [re]compress them, that's true, but a great percentage of the files in this folder are EPUB, ODT, DOC, TXT, MD, HTML... A miserable 1% of compression is way too few to believe that compression is really being applied. Could you tell me if I can do any test or use any especific tool to make sure that Dolphin is the culprit, or not? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
